Executive Order 14202: What Employers Should Know About the Federal Government's Renewed Focus on Religious Discrimination
05.18.26
President Trump recently signed Executive Order 14202, titled “Eradicating Anti-Christian Bias.” While the title suggests a narrow focus, the practical implications for employers are much broader and deserve careful attention.
The executive order directs the Department of Justice to establish a task force to identify and address alleged anti-Christian bias within federal agencies and enforcement practices. The task force is charged with reviewing federal hiring, contracting, grant making and enforcement decisions for evidence of disparate treatment involving Christian individuals and organizations.
Although the executive order is directed at federal agencies, private employers should not assume it has no impact on them. Enforcement priorities matter. The DOJ and EEOC enforce Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, and shifts in federal priorities often influence investigations, litigation strategy and agency guidance involving religious discrimination and accommodation claims.
Importantly, Title VII protects employees of all faiths — and employees with no religious affiliation at all. A heightened federal focus on religious accommodation will likely affect how employers evaluate and respond to accommodation requests across the board.
This development also comes on the heels of the Supreme Court’s decision in Groff v. DeJoy, 143 S. Ct. 2279 (2023), which significantly raised the standard for denying religious accommodations. Employers can no longer rely on minimal inconvenience or nominal cost. Instead, employers must now demonstrate that the requested accommodation would impose “substantial increased costs in relation to the conduct of its particular business.” Taken together, the executive order and the evolving legal landscape signal increased scrutiny of religious discrimination and accommodation issues in the workplace.
Employers should pay particular attention to several recurring risk areas:
- Religious accommodation requests involving scheduling, dress and grooming policies, or objections to particular job duties;
- Religious expression in the workplace and the balance between protected expression and prevention of workplace harassment;
- Conflicts between religious accommodation requests and protections involving other protected classes, including LGBTQ+ employees;
- Additional compliance obligations for federal contractors and grant recipients.
Practical steps employers should consider now include:
- Reviewing religious accommodation policies to ensure they reflect the post-Groff standard;
- Auditing dress, grooming, and scheduling policies for consistency and flexibility;
- Training managers on how to identify and properly escalate accommodation requests;
- Reviewing workplace expression and anti harassment policies;
- Carefully documenting the interactive process and accommodation analysis.
Executive orders do not independently rewrite employment law, but they do shape enforcement priorities, regulatory focus and litigation trends. EO 14202, combined with the Supreme Court’s evolving accommodation standards, strongly suggests that religious discrimination and accommodation claims will remain an area of increased attention in the years ahead. Employers that proactively review policies and practices now will be in a significantly better position than those reacting after a charge or lawsuit is filed.
Aronberg Goldgehn’s employment law team provides proactive guidance to help employers navigate evolving state and federal statutory and regulatory requirements. The team advises on compliance, risk mitigation, policy development and workplace disputes, ensuring organizations are prepared for changes impacting their workforce and operations.
Learn more about how the firm supports clients across the full spectrum of employment law matters.
